<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Liberty Counsel Responds to Crass Quote Attributed to Matt Barber</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.exodusinternational.org/2009/12/18/liberty-counsel-responds-to-crass-quote-attributed-to-matt-barber/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.exodusinternational.org/2009/12/18/liberty-counsel-responds-to-crass-quote-attributed-to-matt-barber/</link>
	<description>Welcome!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:08:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Box Turtle Bulletin &#187; Learn to be a Wackadoodle</title>
		<link>http://blog.exodusinternational.org/2009/12/18/liberty-counsel-responds-to-crass-quote-attributed-to-matt-barber/comment-page-1/#comment-23083</link>
		<dc:creator>Box Turtle Bulletin &#187; Learn to be a Wackadoodle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 01:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.exodusinternational.org/?p=910#comment-23083</guid>
		<description>[...] Barber will teach them that homosexuality is one man violently cramming his penis into another man’s lower intestine and calling it love. And Laurie Higgins will tell the kiddies that it is their Christian duty to support the culture of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Barber will teach them that homosexuality is one man violently cramming his penis into another man’s lower intestine and calling it love. And Laurie Higgins will tell the kiddies that it is their Christian duty to support the culture of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corvino: Fighting gay dehumanization &#124; GayChina.com Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.exodusinternational.org/2009/12/18/liberty-counsel-responds-to-crass-quote-attributed-to-matt-barber/comment-page-1/#comment-5916</link>
		<dc:creator>Corvino: Fighting gay dehumanization &#124; GayChina.com Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 17:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.exodusinternational.org/?p=910#comment-5916</guid>
		<description>[...] barbs between LaBarbera and Randy Thomas, president of the ex-gay group Exodus International, at Thomas’s Exodus blog.  (Thanks to Pam’s House Blend for exposing the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] barbs between LaBarbera and Randy Thomas, president of the ex-gay group Exodus International, at Thomas’s Exodus blog.  (Thanks to Pam’s House Blend for exposing the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corvino: Fighting gay dehumanization &#124; News Blog from 365gay.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.exodusinternational.org/2009/12/18/liberty-counsel-responds-to-crass-quote-attributed-to-matt-barber/comment-page-1/#comment-5910</link>
		<dc:creator>Corvino: Fighting gay dehumanization &#124; News Blog from 365gay.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 14:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.exodusinternational.org/?p=910#comment-5910</guid>
		<description>[...] barbs between LaBarbera and Randy Thomas, president of the ex-gay group Exodus International, at Thomas’s Exodus blog.  (Thanks to Pam’s House Blend for exposing the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] barbs between LaBarbera and Randy Thomas, president of the ex-gay group Exodus International, at Thomas’s Exodus blog.  (Thanks to Pam’s House Blend for exposing the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://blog.exodusinternational.org/2009/12/18/liberty-counsel-responds-to-crass-quote-attributed-to-matt-barber/comment-page-1/#comment-5343</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 15:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.exodusinternational.org/?p=910#comment-5343</guid>
		<description>This has to be one of the most disingenuous explanations I&#039;ve ever heard. First Matt says he never publiicly wrote or made the statement; then he says he made it to Peter LaBarbera in private but gave him permission to make it public. It is a distinction without a difference, and no amount of lawyerly weasel-wording is going to change the fact that Matt Barber has let it be known to the public EXACTLY what he thinks. Matt Staver is correct in his criticism..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has to be one of the most disingenuous explanations I&#8217;ve ever heard. First Matt says he never publiicly wrote or made the statement; then he says he made it to Peter LaBarbera in private but gave him permission to make it public. It is a distinction without a difference, and no amount of lawyerly weasel-wording is going to change the fact that Matt Barber has let it be known to the public EXACTLY what he thinks. Matt Staver is correct in his criticism..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://blog.exodusinternational.org/2009/12/18/liberty-counsel-responds-to-crass-quote-attributed-to-matt-barber/comment-page-1/#comment-29163</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 15:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.exodusinternational.org/?p=910#comment-29163</guid>
		<description>This has to be one of the most disingenuous explanations I&#039;ve ever heard. First Matt says he never publiicly wrote or made the statement; then he says he made it to Peter LaBarbera in private but gave him permission to make it public. It is a distinction without a difference, and no amount of lawyerly weasel-wording is going to change the fact that Matt Barber has let it be known to the public EXACTLY what he thinks. Matt Staver is correct in his criticism..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has to be one of the most disingenuous explanations I&#8217;ve ever heard. First Matt says he never publiicly wrote or made the statement; then he says he made it to Peter LaBarbera in private but gave him permission to make it public. It is a distinction without a difference, and no amount of lawyerly weasel-wording is going to change the fact that Matt Barber has let it be known to the public EXACTLY what he thinks. Matt Staver is correct in his criticism..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie Thurman</title>
		<link>http://blog.exodusinternational.org/2009/12/18/liberty-counsel-responds-to-crass-quote-attributed-to-matt-barber/comment-page-1/#comment-5327</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie Thurman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 19:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.exodusinternational.org/?p=910#comment-5327</guid>
		<description>James, is it correct to assume that your are upset because of the possible inference that you made a comment that was ungentlemanlike or of an inappropriate sexual nature to me? That was certainly not the case, and I apologize if what I said made it sound thus. I hope this is just a misunderstanding that we can clear up quickly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, is it correct to assume that your are upset because of the possible inference that you made a comment that was ungentlemanlike or of an inappropriate sexual nature to me? That was certainly not the case, and I apologize if what I said made it sound thus. I hope this is just a misunderstanding that we can clear up quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie Thurman</title>
		<link>http://blog.exodusinternational.org/2009/12/18/liberty-counsel-responds-to-crass-quote-attributed-to-matt-barber/comment-page-1/#comment-29162</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie Thurman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 19:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.exodusinternational.org/?p=910#comment-29162</guid>
		<description>James, is it correct to assume that your are upset because of the possible inference that you made a comment that was ungentlemanlike or of an inappropriate sexual nature to me? That was certainly not the case, and I apologize if what I said made it sound thus. I hope this is just a misunderstanding that we can clear up quickly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, is it correct to assume that your are upset because of the possible inference that you made a comment that was ungentlemanlike or of an inappropriate sexual nature to me? That was certainly not the case, and I apologize if what I said made it sound thus. I hope this is just a misunderstanding that we can clear up quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie Thurman</title>
		<link>http://blog.exodusinternational.org/2009/12/18/liberty-counsel-responds-to-crass-quote-attributed-to-matt-barber/comment-page-1/#comment-5314</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie Thurman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 13:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.exodusinternational.org/?p=910#comment-5314</guid>
		<description>James, I am baffled as to why you have sought on this occasion and one other recently to publicly contradict me. As I said on the last occasion, I have defended you and taken heat for it. You have done many admirable things and have stood up for truth and battled the forces of evil in a city I used to love. You are a brother in Christ. Peace.

I guess I should not have brought your name into this discussion (which has been strange, indeed, as Thom has already said). Do you not recall a phone conversation we had — a rather long one — in which you discussed gaining certain insights through your Bible study? We spoke of Jezebel being pushed from the tower. You quoted some passages of Scripture to me, and you then went on to talk of the abomination of the act of sodomy because of the specific way in which it &quot;sowed seed.&quot; I remember this conversation quite well. You were very animated.

For heaven&#039;s sake, I see no reason for you to be threatening to &quot;take action&quot; for my pointing out something you said which I happen to agree with. I am not speaking against you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, I am baffled as to why you have sought on this occasion and one other recently to publicly contradict me. As I said on the last occasion, I have defended you and taken heat for it. You have done many admirable things and have stood up for truth and battled the forces of evil in a city I used to love. You are a brother in Christ. Peace.</p>
<p>I guess I should not have brought your name into this discussion (which has been strange, indeed, as Thom has already said). Do you not recall a phone conversation we had — a rather long one — in which you discussed gaining certain insights through your Bible study? We spoke of Jezebel being pushed from the tower. You quoted some passages of Scripture to me, and you then went on to talk of the abomination of the act of sodomy because of the specific way in which it &#8220;sowed seed.&#8221; I remember this conversation quite well. You were very animated.</p>
<p>For heaven&#8217;s sake, I see no reason for you to be threatening to &#8220;take action&#8221; for my pointing out something you said which I happen to agree with. I am not speaking against you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie Thurman</title>
		<link>http://blog.exodusinternational.org/2009/12/18/liberty-counsel-responds-to-crass-quote-attributed-to-matt-barber/comment-page-1/#comment-29161</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie Thurman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 13:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.exodusinternational.org/?p=910#comment-29161</guid>
		<description>James, I am baffled as to why you have sought on this occasion and one other recently to publicly contradict me. As I said on the last occasion, I have defended you and taken heat for it. You have done many admirable things and have stood up for truth and battled the forces of evil in a city I used to love. You are a brother in Christ. Peace.

I guess I should not have brought your name into this discussion (which has been strange, indeed, as Thom has already said). Do you not recall a phone conversation we had — a rather long one — in which you discussed gaining certain insights through your Bible study? We spoke of Jezebel being pushed from the tower. You quoted some passages of Scripture to me, and you then went on to talk of the abomination of the act of sodomy because of the specific way in which it &quot;sowed seed.&quot; I remember this conversation quite well. You were very animated.

For heaven&#039;s sake, I see no reason for you to be threatening to &quot;take action&quot; for my pointing out something you said which I happen to agree with. I am not speaking against you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, I am baffled as to why you have sought on this occasion and one other recently to publicly contradict me. As I said on the last occasion, I have defended you and taken heat for it. You have done many admirable things and have stood up for truth and battled the forces of evil in a city I used to love. You are a brother in Christ. Peace.</p>
<p>I guess I should not have brought your name into this discussion (which has been strange, indeed, as Thom has already said). Do you not recall a phone conversation we had — a rather long one — in which you discussed gaining certain insights through your Bible study? We spoke of Jezebel being pushed from the tower. You quoted some passages of Scripture to me, and you then went on to talk of the abomination of the act of sodomy because of the specific way in which it &#8220;sowed seed.&#8221; I remember this conversation quite well. You were very animated.</p>
<p>For heaven&#8217;s sake, I see no reason for you to be threatening to &#8220;take action&#8221; for my pointing out something you said which I happen to agree with. I am not speaking against you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thom Hunter</title>
		<link>http://blog.exodusinternational.org/2009/12/18/liberty-counsel-responds-to-crass-quote-attributed-to-matt-barber/comment-page-1/#comment-5301</link>
		<dc:creator>Thom Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 19:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.exodusinternational.org/?p=910#comment-5301</guid>
		<description>This thread is not just odd, it is evidence that it is very easy to get distracted from the good that can come from exchanges when people suddenly begin taking everything personally and believeing it is all about them.  It demonstrates the distance between our &quot;selves&quot; and grace.  

Surely, Mr. Hartline, you can have the patience to allow Debbie to respond to you.  I&#039;ve read Debbie&#039;s blog, wherein she has revealed her heart, and I know Debbie Thurman to be very careful in making statements.  Obviously I was not present during whatever personal conversation you may have had with her.  It would certainly be possible to be shockingly descriptive of an act you might find abhorrent without it being a sexually explicit conversation with a woman, which you say you do not have.  You express yourself in this thread with considerable emotion.  Perhaps you had a conversation in which your emotions took hold.  I don&#039;t know.  I&#039;ve certainly been there and have regretted it and had to take back some words of my own.  

The people involved in this thread are all ones who profess to be doing what they do out of a love for Christ and a desire to serve him.  Yet, you are threatening people&#039;s jobs and the pursuit of legal action and you are certainly reacting in haste.  This is a day after Christmas.  

I think you would have to find that Debbie Thurman intended you harm in order to follow through on your description of her actions as being libelous.  I don&#039;t believe that&#039;s even a slight possibility.  Perhaps there is disagreement among us on the way we express ourselves.  I&#039;ve been told that there are times I should be more condemning and &quot;honest.&quot;  I pray about that . . . and grace appears to be the direction in which I believe God would have me go.

Gay activists and those who believe God cannot change the heart or even the orientation of a person struggling with sexual identity take heart and draw strength from our attacks on each other.  I hope you will be patient and allow Debbie to respond to your comments.  Your harshness is not painting a very good picture.

Thom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This thread is not just odd, it is evidence that it is very easy to get distracted from the good that can come from exchanges when people suddenly begin taking everything personally and believeing it is all about them.  It demonstrates the distance between our &#8220;selves&#8221; and grace.  </p>
<p>Surely, Mr. Hartline, you can have the patience to allow Debbie to respond to you.  I&#8217;ve read Debbie&#8217;s blog, wherein she has revealed her heart, and I know Debbie Thurman to be very careful in making statements.  Obviously I was not present during whatever personal conversation you may have had with her.  It would certainly be possible to be shockingly descriptive of an act you might find abhorrent without it being a sexually explicit conversation with a woman, which you say you do not have.  You express yourself in this thread with considerable emotion.  Perhaps you had a conversation in which your emotions took hold.  I don&#8217;t know.  I&#8217;ve certainly been there and have regretted it and had to take back some words of my own.  </p>
<p>The people involved in this thread are all ones who profess to be doing what they do out of a love for Christ and a desire to serve him.  Yet, you are threatening people&#8217;s jobs and the pursuit of legal action and you are certainly reacting in haste.  This is a day after Christmas.  </p>
<p>I think you would have to find that Debbie Thurman intended you harm in order to follow through on your description of her actions as being libelous.  I don&#8217;t believe that&#8217;s even a slight possibility.  Perhaps there is disagreement among us on the way we express ourselves.  I&#8217;ve been told that there are times I should be more condemning and &#8220;honest.&#8221;  I pray about that . . . and grace appears to be the direction in which I believe God would have me go.</p>
<p>Gay activists and those who believe God cannot change the heart or even the orientation of a person struggling with sexual identity take heart and draw strength from our attacks on each other.  I hope you will be patient and allow Debbie to respond to your comments.  Your harshness is not painting a very good picture.</p>
<p>Thom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

